TSA: Is Privacy an Ultimatum?

Passport USA

Image by clappstar via Flickr

Scrutiny over the TSA scanners and pat-downs is leading the American public down a familiar road. Talk of replacing the pat-downs with a standardized national ID card (see Alternative to TSA pat-downs), while not on the floor yet, illuminates a similar pattern characterizing post-9/11 America. It presents yet another example of the government taking a public grievance and turning it on itself, as if to say, “If you [the public] refuse option A, then you leave us [the government] no choice but to institute option B.” But this hypothetical, if it becomes reality, is more damaging to our civil liberties than the invasive pat-downs or scanners. Why? First, and one’s opinion on this is purely personal, many view the mandatory issue of a national ID card that carries all pertinent and personal information including travel history, affiliations, and the like, more a gross violation of one’s privacy than intrusive pat-downs. However, some see it the other way, opting to sacrifice one’s personal information over one’s person. This, at least, is the way the mainstream media is framing the issue—personal privacy versus physical privacy. The implication here is that framing the issue this way overlooks and undermines the basic issue of one’s right to privacy.

Hidden beneath this framework is a pattern, whereby the government sets the agenda that provides only an ultimatum to the public, not a dialogue. Consequently, the government imposes an agenda on the people instead of proposing one by the people. And this illuminates the second, more fundamental and subtle, violation of our civil liberties. We must now choose which aspect of our privacy to place on the chopping block, as if the parts do not equal the whole.

Such issues point to the fact that our government is no longer ours and has not been for quite some time. Moreover, so long as the media presents issues in ways that are inherently divisive, they serve to buffer the government from any concentrated public backlash. The ultimatum-type governance presented by the TSA issue is simply another example of the transformation of government by the people to government by the tyrannical minority.



About Jeremiah Dow
I have a B.S. in Politics, Philosophy, and Economics with a minor in Economics. I finished school in 2010 and am currently working on independent research in various areas including political and economic philosophy, government, and history. I am also currently looking for work in research, particularly the social sciences dealing with public policy work. I aspire to a top-level graduate institution, but would first prefer some professional research experience. Some of my primary influences are Ayn Rand, Noam Chomsky, and Howard Zinn among others.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: